NZ: Pacifica Present Oral Submission Tonight at Barrycourt MotorLodge Parnell

Pacifica are scheduled to present an oral submission to the select committee at 7.30pm today. It is open to the public.
If you are available to go and support their submission, please do so.

Venue: Barrycourt Motor Lodge, Gladstone Rd, Parnell, Auckland, NZ

Submission on the Local Government (Auckland Law Reform) Bill

Monday 8 February 2010

To the Auckland Governance Legislation Committee

AGL

This submission is from P.A.C.I.F.I.C.A Auckland Central, Timeout and Tamaki branches.

Contact details:

PACIFICA Vice President – Northern Region

Josephine Bartley

XXXXXXX

We wish to appear before the committee to speak to our submission.

We wish that the following appear in support of this submission:

Representative Peta Mua (Chair – Tamaki),

Josephine Bartley (Northern Region Vice President) Christina Atoa Tapu

Anne Fitisemanu, Auckland Central branch.

Members of PACIFICA branches.

About us:

We are the Auckland based branches of twenty branches throughout New Zealand. PACIFICA is an incorporated society established in 1976 aimed at the empowerment of Pacific women to better participate in New Zealand society. This submission is from the Auckland region encompassing 100 members and families resident in Manukau City, Auckland City, North Shore City and Waitakere City.

Summary:

We want our Council to maintain the community/social wellbeing focus which has been prevalent particularly with Manukau City Council. We do not want to see Council restricted to just “core activities”.

We are concerned about the lack of role clarity for the local boards. Local boards are a recognised infrastructure which are comprised of community leaders, people of credible integrity, cultural status and “mana” elected by their communities to be “their voice” in the local council, and to actively participate, contribute and advocate for the wellbeing of their community. In the current structure identified they lack power. These leaders are being ignored, a true reflection of a system that is mono-cultural, ego centric and self centred. These leaders will need restoration of power otherwise they will be ineffective and useless to the communities they serve “and considered a rubber stamp board”.

We are concerned about council controlled organisations in particular how their focus is profit, this in effect puts profit before people. Privatisation is a major concern as we do not want to see our region’s assets sold off, and this is alarmingly serious. Our assets are our true heritage as a people of this land, Aotearoa. In terms of the Pacific advisory panel we do question reasons why this will be dissolved in 2013.

As citizens of this nation we believe that this Pacific Advisory Panel must be an integral part of the system and justified.

Specific issues

Local Boards:

This again, we reiterate the importance of having this body in the structure. It is the only recognised authority where the community participate in local government. It appears to be the only way for grassroots to participate in local government. The role of the local boards needs to be defined in legislation otherwise it is subject to ambiguity and at the mercy of whichever authority is tasked with defining it. In order for the Auckland Council to be able to effectively govern the region the local issues should be given over to the Local boards. Local boards will need to have a clear definition of what it can do and it will need to be properly resourced to serve the community. Auckland has the largest Pacific Islands people city in the world. Therefore the Local Boards is the JUST vehicle to effect change and showcasing that commitment to local government and communities. By having effective local boards Council is valuing the worth of community participation.

Council controlled organisations (CCO):

Council controlled organisations are about profit and not people, we strongly request more accountability at this level. We are not sure as to what form this accountability should take but we are acutely aware that something needs to be done about allowing the public to voice their concern over pricing issues and to have genuine interaction with the CCO in order to have those concerns addressed. There is only but one source for water so the monopoly by one company to manage it is holding us as residents to ransom.

In particular we mention Metrowater and how this was used as a cash cow for the Auckland City Council. Communities voiced their concerns about the high prices they were paying for water and yet Metrowater was turning over millions in profit. Water is a basic necessity of life we do not want to see it being used as a money maker by Auckland Council just like we do not want to see any CCO using the public to make money. This is a silent “killing system” by those in power, regardless.

Privatisation

We do not want to see water privatised. We do not want to see any assets privatised and are concerned at the raising of the moratorium to allow the Ports of Auckland to be sold. We do not support selling off of assets.

The Pacific Advisory panel

Pacific people are leaders within their own professions and are a significant part of the make up of this city. As an ideal we would like to see Pacific people in the decision making roles such Auckland Councillors and we as an organisation will continue to support Pacific people striving to achieve these positions.

What is being proposed is an advisory panel and going with this we question the dissolution of an advisory panel after three years. We propose a review rather than dissolution as a way to judge its viability since the panel would just be coming out of its infancy.

We would like the Pacific people of Auckland to vote for the representatives onto this panel in a fair and democratic process and not for the Mayor or Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs to appoint. This keeps the power with the local communities to appoint one of their own rather than be influenced by Central Government and it also invigorates Pacific participation. We do however agree with the Ministry of Pacific Islands facilitating and supporting this transparent process.

We are concerned that Pacific has been relegated to merely advisory in this local governance structure. Auckland City brands itself as the first city of the Pacific then Pacific should be involved in its governance rather than on the sidelines in an advisory panel.

General comments

Consultation

We are concerned at the consultation process, it has been rushed and hushed. The process is out of sight and out of mind, many communities have not been included in this movement. Some parts of the community do know what’s happening and others do not, there is fragmentation in the community and fast deadlines do nothing to help groups undergo effective consultation.

Mayor

With the new Mayor holding such a high position within the new supercity structure how will he or she be able to connect with the people, they will be further removed from their communities yet in the previous structure they were more accessible. The formalisation of this current supercity allows the mayor of Auckland to dictate and alienate its fellow constituents.

Maori seats:

We re-affirm our stand in supporting the Maori seats on Auckland Council. Since there is going to be a Maori Board, we emphasise the need for Maori representatives to be elected by Maori in Auckland and not by Central Government.

Thank you for your consideration.

PACIFICA Auckland members.


Auckland City Councillors Question Parliament’s Timing of Final Auckland Bill Pushed Through

[tweetmeme]Media Release
City Vision-Labour Councillors – Auckland City Council
For Immediate Release
Friday 18 December 2009

Third Auckland Bill Timelines Unfair and Ill-Advised

The timelines for the 3rd Auckland Bill that was introduced to the House and sent to the Auckland Governance Legislation Select Committee this week are unfair and ill-advised, say City Vision-Labour councillors while the text of the Bill provides few details on the powers and roles of local boards while raising significant concerns for Aucklander’s assets and services.

Tamaki-Maungakiekie Ward Councillor Richard Northey said, “We now know Government is allowing only until the Friday after Waitangi for making submissions. People I know are arranging to come back from their holidays earlier than they intended just to hold meetings of their organisations to try and work out details of the third Auckland Bill and to draw up their submissions. There are still a lot of important local and regional issues not addressed in the third Bill that community organisations will be keen to make submissions on. These include the actual powers and roles of the new local boards; whether they should be called local or community councils instead; the real powers and roles of the Maori Board and of the Pasifika and Ethnic Bodies. There is developing concern that the provisions protecting water services from privatisation are only proposed to last until 2015 and for other key Council assets only until 2012.”

Councillor Northey continued, “The under-representation of Auckland and Waitakere-based wards may not be able to be corrected until 2018 unless the new Auckland Council resolves to create Maori Wards. The proposed Council Controlled Organisation to be responsible for main streets and for events appears as messy and unnecessarily centralised and bureaucratic as the transport one is already proving to be. In short, the 3rd Bill is proving to be a dog’s breakfast and the Government needs to allow more time for Aucklanders to digest and respond intelligently to it.”

Tamaki-Maungakiekie Ward Councillor Leila Boyle said, “The timeline for the 3rd Auckland Bill is very tight with hearings beginning on 22 February and the Select Committee’s report due on 4 May. It is outrageous that this very important process closes well before the Local Government Commission hands down their final determination on 1 March as the boundaries and number of local boards as well as number of members on each local board does have a bearing on their workload. I believe the Select Committee needs to be thinking about this legislation in the context of the shape of the structure; it is irresponsible and ill-advised not to be considering these things together and holistically. This amalgamation is doomed to fail with this truncated and silo mentality process.”

Eden-Albert Ward Councillor Glenda Fryer said, “The 3rd bill is complex and there will be little time for the public debate that should be part of the process, because the media ‘silly season’ is more attuned to light content stories. Informed public debate is not what the national party and its allies want as they call for submissions in the ‘silly season’ and leave little time for public meetings so that communities can really be informed and play a part of the process.”

Independent Hauraki Gulf Islands Councillor Denise Roche said, “This third bill is legislation on the hoof. The sheer speed with which the National-ACT Government is pushing the future governance arrangements for Auckland means they’re not only shutting the average person out of the process but they’re also having to make things up and fix things up as they go. This third bill is full of amendments to the second law introduced only a couple of months ago – and I bet there’ll be more tweaks because of things they’ve forgotten. I think we all know that the faster you go, the bigger the mess.”

ENDS

Contact:

Councillor Richard Northey 027 247 9662
Councillor Leila Boyle 027 245 1440
Councillor Glenda Fryer 027 272 0816
Councillor Denise Roche 027 209 7554

Additional Information:

Text of Local Government (Auckland Law Reform) Bill in:

• Pdf format (warning, large file size – about 3 MB) http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2009/0112/latest/096be8ed804cda53.pdf

• Online text format http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2009/0112/latest/DLM2635005.html

Auckland Governance Legislation Select Committee details and information: http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/SC/Details/AucklandGL/1/3/f/00DBHOH_BBSC_SCAGL_1-Business-before-the-Auckland-Governance-Legislation.htm

Local Government (Auckland Law Reform) Bill submissions page. You can make your submission online by scrolling to the bottom. The closing date for submissions is Friday, 12 February 2010: http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/SC/MakeSub/6/3/a/49SCAGL_SCF_00DBHOH_BILL9729_1-Local-Government-Auckland-Law-Reform.htm

Share


People’s Input Needed On Auckland SuperCity Boundaries; Deadline 11th Dec ’09

Media Release: Tamaki Community Board to consult community on Auckland super-city boundaries

For Immediate Release
Tamaki Community Board

TAMAKI COMMUNITY BOARD TO CONSULT COMMUNITY ON AUCKLAND SUPER-CITY BOUNDARIES

The Tamaki Community Board is to consult the people of the Tamaki Ward – Point England, Glen Innes, Panmure, Mt Wellington and Otahuhu – about the draft Auckland super-city boundaries.

The proposed new boundaries for the Auckland Super City were released on Friday by the NZ Local Government Commission.

Submissions on the draft boundaries must be submitted by 11 December 2009.

The Tamaki Community Board will host two community events to consult residents, business people and key stakeholders in the Tamaki area about the proposed boundaries.

“We need to make sure that Tamaki people have a say about the future shape and size of our community,” says Tamaki Community Board Chair Kate Sutton.

“The Tamaki Community Board is, therefore, inviting everyone in the Tamaki area to discuss the proposed new boundaries of the Tamaki Community and their implications for residents. Their ideas are important and they can make a difference.”

The two public meetings are:

Southern Tamaki Meeting
When: Monday 30 November 2009, 6-8pm
Where: Otahuhu Town Hall, 10 High Street, Otahuhu

Central and Northern Tamaki Meeting
When: Tuesday 1 December 2009, 6- 8pm
Where: Maungarei Rooms, 7-13 Pilkington Road, Panmure

For further information, please contact Kate Sutton, Chairperson, Tamaki Community Board, 0274 707 911 or Tam White, the Tamaki Community Board’s Democracy Services Advisor on 307 7253 or tam.white@aucklandcity.govt.nz.

–ENDS–

Notes
1. The Local Government Commission’s report on the boundaries and maps of the proposed council and board boundaries are available online at: http://bit.ly/7mVI9K


Press Statement: Local Government – more than just business units for sale

The Government must start recognising that the Auckland region’s local governments aren’t just business units to be broken up and put on the auction block for sale, says Labour’s Associate Local Government spokesperson Su’a William Sio.

“Our councils are much more than that, they are also democratic organisations that were charged under the Local Government Act 2000 to look after the wellbeing of the people, namely their: Read the rest of this entry »